Cricket Videos and cricket highlights clips

0724942 (November 21st, 2008 @ 12:07 pm)

You know nothing about the Egyptian culture. They where not white. I can prove you that were probably asian/arab people!

0724942 (November 21st, 2008 @ 12:05 pm)

No, but they did there part ;). The Egyptian empire was not a white empire. They where probably arab of asian, not white! Then, te Lybian (black) farao's where not resposible for the fall of the Egyptian empire. Every man who studied the Egyptian empire knows that ;). Leopold II was also your king. He was white and killed alot of African people. So yes, it's important! So fuck you and your nazi-organisations.

SturmUndDrang13 (November 21st, 2008 @ 11:29 am)

Yeah, with blue eyes.

prepschoolkid (November 21st, 2008 @ 11:18 am)

egyptians were probably arab/semetic people, and maybe some black people.

SturmUndDrang13 (November 21st, 2008 @ 10:33 am)

Ik kan er niet aan doen dat jij niet kan rekeken. Ga maar terug naar de lagere school, prutser. Trouwens, het merendeel van de zwarten leefden beter onder blank bestuur dan onder zwart bestuur. Hoe ga je dat op discriminatie steken, oelewapper.

SturmUndDrang13 (November 21st, 2008 @ 10:32 am)

So tell me, did they shape the world? Furthermore, the Egypt empire was white. When there were black farao's they made the country co to shit, like the Nubians. And who gives a fuck about your stupid Leopold II, he's the embodyment of BELGIUM. Fuck Belgium.

0724942 (November 21st, 2008 @ 9:14 am)

We shaped the world? That is incorrect. The first great empires where Afrikan or eastern empires like the Egyptian empire, mesopotamian empire, the hittite empire etc... It's not correct to say that we shaped the world ;). Domination? Ok, in some ways it's good, what about king leopold II? He killed 16mil. of Congolese people! What about the slavery? That wasn't good either... . The white people killed millions of black people... . Are you saying that slavery was a good thing?

0724942 (November 21st, 2008 @ 9:04 am)

Beste, Ik denk dat we deze zinloze discussie beter kunnen laten varen. Jij zegt A en ik zeg B. Geen van ons beiden zal van mening veranderen. Armoede is erg, zowel voor blanken als zwarten. Voor de apartheid hadden alle blanken een goed leven terwijl de 'zwarte' bevolking werd onderdrukt, gediscrimineerd. Bovendien leefden ze in erbarmelijke omtandigheden. Nu echter leven ook verschillende blanken in armoede, wat erg is natuurlijk, maar wat moeten we dan zeggen van de zwarte bevolking?

shadowmwo (November 21st, 2008 @ 6:08 am)

exactly ambelle

ambelle (November 21st, 2008 @ 5:40 am)

Ok seriously, its called an eye for an eye. it's hard to have sympathy for these people.

SturmUndDrang13 (November 20th, 2008 @ 11:51 pm)

Yeah, times are changing all right. Under white reign, black S-Africans had better life-standard than any other black African country. Now the general condition has decreased for blacks in SA in favor of a small black elite. The S-African economy collopsed, just like it did with Rhodesia!

SturmUndDrang13 (November 20th, 2008 @ 11:47 pm)

Natuurlijk hebben zwarten in Afrika meer armoede want ze zijn met meer. Net zoals China meer BNP heeft als ons. Niet per capita natuurlijk. Gij zijt gewoon te dom om zoeits als capita te gebruiken. Dat moet je gebruiken om te vergelijken, stronthoofd. Moet ik het er komen inrammen? 10% blanken, 20% blank onderklasse-aandeel. Valt er nu nog geen frank, dipshit.